KTBB News, Weather, Talk

DALLAS (AP) — Police responded Tuesday to reports of a shooting at a Dallas high school where students were seen leaving the campus and school authorities later reported the campus had been secured.

Authorities did not immediately provide further details on the incident, which drew a large number of police and emergency vehicles to the campus of Wilmer-Hutchins High School in south Dallas.

The Dallas Independent School District later said the campus had been secured but it did not elaborate on what had occurred. The school has roughly 1,000 students.

Aerial television footage taken above the high school showed multiple police vehicles at the complex on Tuesday afternoon.

By mid-afternoon the school district said parents could reunite with students at a nearby stadium. The district also said counselors were available on site.

DALLAS – The Dallas Morning News reports the Trump administration is pulling nearly $64 million in support for a proposed Dallas-to-Houston bullet train project, with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy calling the project “a waste of taxpayer funds.” The U.S. Department of Transportation announced Monday that it would terminate a $63.9 million grant for the project led by Texas Central, the company behind the planned high-speed rail line. The funds were awarded to Amtrak, a public rail provider that Texas Central said in 2023 would help move the project forward. The Federal Railroad Administration and Amtrak agreed to terminate the $63.9 million previously awarded under the Corridor Identification and Development Program, according to Monday’s announcement. “This project was originally announced as a purely private venture, but as the cost estimates dramatically ballooned, the Texas Central Railway proposal became dependent on Amtrak and federal dollars for development work,” the DOT said in a statement.

“The project capital cost is now believed to be over $40 billion — making construction unrealistic and a risky venture for the taxpayer,” the statement added. The company announced plans more than a decade ago for a proposed train to shuttle passengers from Dallas to Houston in about 90 minutes compared to the 3½-hour car trip on Interstate 45. Texas Central planned to model the bullet train after partner Japan Central Railways’ Shinkansen system. The project has faced many delays and leadership changes since, and uncertainty about the final costs remain. In a hearing before the Texas House Transportation Committee earlier this month, a Texas Central representative said details about how the rail line would be funded and the project timeline remains in flux. The company also expressed doubt that Amtrak would continue to lead the effort.

AUSTIN — The measles outbreak in western Texas continues to grow, with 561 confirmed cases, according to new data published Tuesday.

This is an increase of 20 new cases over the last five days.

Almost all of the cases are in unvaccinated individuals or in individuals whose vaccination status is unknown, according to the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS).

Four of the cases are among residents who have been vaccinated with one dose of the measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine. Seven cases are among those vaccinated with two doses.

At least 58 people with measles have been hospitalized so far.

Children and teenagers between ages 5 and 17 make up the majority of cases, followed by children ages 4 and under.

Gaines County, which borders New Mexico, remains the epicenter of the outbreak, with 364 cases confirmed so far, DSHS data shows.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

HOUSTON – The Dallas Morning News says Texas litigation powerhouse Susman Godfrey filed a federal lawsuit late Friday accusing President Donald Trump of issuing unconstitutional executive orders against it and other law firms. The law firm calls the president’s actions a violation of the rule of law and “a grave threat to this foundational premise of our Republic.” The 66-page complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., alleges that President Trump “is abusing the powers of his office” and “is engaged in an unprecedented and unconstitutional assault on those bedrock principles [found in Article I and in the First and Fifth Amendments] and on the independent bar.” “In recent weeks, the president has issued multiple executive orders targeting law firms and their employees in an express campaign of retaliation for representing clients and causes he disfavors or employing lawyers he dislikes,” the lawsuit states, “If a president can with impunity seek to destroy a law firm because of the clients it represents, then the rule of law itself is in grave danger.”

“The executive order makes no secret of its unconstitutional retaliatory and discriminatory intent to punish Susman Godfrey for its work defending the integrity of the 2020 presidential election,” the Houston-based firm states in the complaint. Susman Godfrey served as legal counsel for Dominion in its defamation lawsuit against Fox News and other media outlets, which broadcasted claims by President Trump and his supporters that the Dominion electronic voting machines helped rig the 2020 election. Fox News settled the lawsuit for $787.5 million instead of going to trial. And the very same day that the White House released the executive order against Susman Godfrey, lawyers for the firm won a huge court victory for Dominion in a billion-dollar defamation case against the conservative news channel Newsmax Media in another 2020 presidential election dispute. On Wednesday, President Trump issued an executive order that accuses the firm of “egregious conduct and conflicts of interest” and representing “clients that engage in conduct undermining critical American interests and priorities.” The order by the president suspends “security clearances held by individuals at Susman Godfrey pending a review of whether such clearances are consistent with the national interest.” “Susman spearheads efforts to weaponize the American legal system and degrade the quality of American elections,” President Trump wrote in the executive order. “Susman funds groups that engage in dangerous efforts to undermine the effectiveness of the U.S. military through the injection of political and radical ideology, and it supports efforts to discriminate on the basis of race.”

AUSTIN – The Dallas Morning News reports that in what could portend a sweeping change for education in Texas, the state House is set to vote on a school choice bill Wednesday that would create a $1 billion fund for parents who could then use taxpayer dollars to pay for private school education. The vote is one of the few remaining hurdles for the legislation, which has been a top priority for Gov. Greg Abbott and passed in the Senate on Feb. 5. The proposal, Senate Bill 2, has been at the center of one of the most intense political fights at the Legislature over the past two years. The bill appears to have enough support to pass the House. More than half of the chamber signed on as sponsors of the bill. Still, school districts and advocates will be paying close attention Wednesday to see if that support holds. Passage in the House would give the bill a clear path to the governor’s desk. Changes could still be made to the bill in a conference committee of lawmakers from the Senate and House who would work out differences between the versions of the bill each chamber passed.

Similar proposals in previous years have failed in the House after rural Republicans sided with Democrats to block school voucher-like proposals. This year could be different after Abbott successfully campaigned to unseat several Republican members of the House who voted against a similar bill in 2023. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, said that the bill will pass during a March 25 news conference alongside the governor and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. “We can fully fund public education and do school choice at the same time,” Burrows said, adding that he was “excited” to send the bill to the governor’s desk. The House will also take up a bill Wednesday that will provide teacher pay raises and increase the per-student funding for public schools. It is expected to pass with bipartisan support. The voucherlike proposal the House will consider Wednesday would create a program to provide education savings accounts of roughly $10,000 for participants. Public education advocates generally oppose any legislation that would send public dollars to private education for fear that it will siphon money from the public education system that educates the vast majority of Texas children.

AUSTIN – The Texas House preliminarily approved a bill Monday that would allow universities to directly pay student athletes for their “name, likeness and image,” despite concerns from some lawmakers that the proposal would disadvantage smaller schools and fail to sufficiently protect the students at the center of these deals.

The House is expected to formally pass the bill in the coming days. It will then go to the Senate, where it may face a tougher road.

Texas’ current laws allow outside entities, like national advertisers or athletic boosters, to pay student athletes, but prohibit universities from paying them directly. House Bill 126, filed by Rep. Carl Tepper, a Lubbock Republican, would lift that restriction.

The proposal comes a year after the NCAA settled a class-action lawsuit that opened the door for universities to pay student athletes, creating a revenue-sharing model in which universities in certain conferences could distribute up to $20 million to athletes annually.

Supporters of the bill say it aligns Texas law with anticipated NCAA rule changes as a result of that settlement and ensures Texas schools can continue to recruit top-tier student athletes. Tepper said Monday that the Legislature would be “killing college football in Texas” if they voted it down.

But Rep. Mitch Little, a Republican from Lewisville, said Texas’ performance in college football and basketball was doing just fine without this bill. He said the proposal threatened to “grow the gap” between universities with big athletics budgets and deep-pocket donors — like Texas Tech, Texas A&M and the University of Texas at Austin — and smaller schools that can’t afford to pay large dollar amounts to attract student athletes.

He pointed to Cody Campbell, a former Texas Tech football player, university regent and oil and gas billionaire who founded an NIL collective to help recruit top-ranked athletes to become Red Raiders.

“What are the other universities to do who don’t have a Cody Campbell, or an Elon Musk, to help facilitate the athletic endeavors of their universities?” Little asked. “How can they possibly compete?”

Tepper said the settlement was expected to impose limits on how much universities could disburse. He added that he was also personally concerned about the widening gap between small and large universities, but “professionally, this is a decision of the courts. You can take this up with them.”

Several lawmakers raised concerns about what recourse student athletes would have to enforce their NIL contracts if they were injured, the university breaches the contract or their coach decides “they stink,” as Little put it, and kicks them off the team.

State universities typically enjoy sovereign immunity protections that prevent them from being sued. Tepper said he anticipated that student athletes’ agents would negotiate certain protections on their behalf and rejected proposed amendments to proactively waive universities’ sovereign immunity.

Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins, a San Antonio Democrat, said her concern was about young people suddenly having access to large amounts of money with few guardrails. She proposed that Texas require NIL money to be put into a trust fund that student athletes would only access after at a certain age, which Tepper rejected.

“I can tell you with firsthand knowledge, a lot of these players are getting in the millions of dollars,” she said. “My concern is protecting them not just in the short run, but the long run.”

“If they can get a million dollars, I recommend they take a million dollars,” Tepper said.

Article originally published by The Texas Tribune. To read the originally published article, click here.

McALLEN — Democrats are ready to fight for South Texas.

That is the message Kendall Scudder, the new chair of the Texas Democratic Party, shared last weekend as he visited the Rio Grande Valley for the first time since being elected in March.

Scudder held two town hall events in the region — once considered a Democratic stronghold — on Saturday as part of a series of town halls he plans to host across the state to declare a new day for Texas Democrats.

Speaking to a crowd in the McAllen public library’s auditorium, Scudder, 35, said the party will throw punches, not just take them.

“If we keep moving backward here, we don’t just lose votes, we start losing sitting electeds that are good people that are fighting for their communities down here,” Scudder said during an interview before the event.

“This is a place that we have to be showing up in and fighting back, and we got into this mess because we weren’t,” they said.

Scudder replaced former Democratic Chair Gilberto Hinojosa, a Rio Grande Valley native, who stepped down in November after 12 years that included last year’s devastating election cycle.

All four Valley counties voted for President Donald Trump, including Starr County which hadn’t voted for a Republican presidential candidate in more than 100 years.

To begin making inroads, the party must fill vacancies in their ranks, including precinct chair and county chair positions which are 50% and 20% vacant, respectively, Scudder said.

The goal is to have more people on the ground who know what is happening in their communities and who can help the party reach more voters.

He knows Valley voters have felt that the Democratic Party has taken them for granted, but he hopes to rectify that by focusing on economic issues such as increasing the minimum wage and improving working conditions.

“I think this area has felt kind of abandoned by our party for a while and I want to make sure that it is crystal clear to folks that the Valley matters to us,” Scudder said. “The working people down here deserve advocates who will fight to make sure they get fair wages for working conditions.”

The Democrats have been ceding ground in the Valley to Republicans for years.

In 2022, Democrats lost the 15th Congressional District for the first time to Republican Monica De La Cruz after the Texas Legislature redrew the congressional maps, making the seat more favorable to Republicans.

Congressional Republicans recently have come under fire for declining to hold in-person town halls, on advice from the National Republican Congressional Committee. The guidance came after lawmakers faced public backlash during town halls over federal funding cuts mandated by the Trump administration.

Though De La Cruz held a telephone town hall last month, Scudder and leaders of the Hidalgo County Democratic Party criticized her for not taking questions in person.

Organizers of Saturday’s event placed an empty chair on stage with a photo of De La Cruz that said “Where’s Monica?”

“Is Monica here? We have a seat for her,” said Richard Gonzales, chair of the Hidalgo County Democratic Party.

A spokesperson for De La Cruz called Saturday’s event a political stunt and said the congresswoman would be happy to consider invitations to events from nonpartisan, credible organizations which, they said, the Texas Democratic Party is not.

“On most days, it barely qualifies as an organization,” they said.

“Congresswoman De La Cruz loves nothing more than meeting with the people of South Texas—and she does so often,” the spokesperson said. “That’s why she regularly holds office hours in all seven counties and hosts virtual town halls so that working parents, veterans, and the district’s nearly 19,000 disabled residents can attend.”

Michelle Vallejo, De La Cruz’s two-time Democratic opponent, accused her of taking pre-screened questions during the tele-town hall and further argued that De La Cruz does not represent the region’s interests.

Hoping to inject optimism into the Democrats in the audience, Vallejo pointed out that while De La Cruz won the majority of the votes in the district, she was carried to victory by the voters in counties north of the Valley.

“She has not once won in Hidalgo County,” Vallejo said of De La Cruz’s home county which also has the most voters in the district.

When Democrats next take on De La Cruz in 2026, they might have some star power behind them.

Gonzales confirmed that Bobby Pulido, a Latin Grammy Award-winning Tejano artist and Edinburg native, is interested in running for the Democratic nomination. However, Pulido, 51, will not be making an official announcement until the end of his farewell tour at the end of 2025.

Scudder said the party needs to start putting in the work into building relationships within the community, long before election season comes along, to be successful.

“People would love to be able just to come in and buy their way out of a problem,” Scudder said. “That’s not going to happen here.”

However, money is an issue for the party.

During a stop in Brownsville, Scudder said the party is not in great financial shape but is working on raising money to help it get out of that situation.

When they do have the resources, he pledged he would not hire additional staff until they could have a Spanish-language communications department.

“Thirty percent of Texans speak Spanish at home. In House District 15, which is highly viewed as one of the most contentious races in the state of Texas, that number is 67%” he said. “For us to not have a Spanish-language comms department is completely derelict.”

Andres Rios, a 65-year-old accountant from Brownsville, questioned Scudder about the party’s focus on social issues, saying that older voters told him they voted for Trump over Kamala Harris in the presidential election because they believed Democrats were focusing too much on issues like transgender rights.

Scudder said the party should not lead with those issues but emphasized that the party is a coalition of different types of people who all had a seat at the table and they should not run away from their beliefs.

“We believe what we believe, because it’s the right thing to do, and we are not sellouts,” Scudder said. However, he added that the party should not lead with social issues but, instead focus on problems that affect people of every background.

“What every group of people within our coalition has in common is that they all pay bills,” he said. “We want to make sure everybody … is welcome and being treated appropriately.”

Article originally published by The Texas Tribune. To read the originally published article, click here.