Today is
Friday March 28, 2025
(WASHINGTON) -- A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to preserve the contents of the chat in which top national security officials used the Signal app to discuss military strikes in Yemen as they were taking place earlier this month.
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ordered the top cabinet officials named in a lawsuit by the government transparency group American Oversight to retain any messages sent and received over Signal between March 11 and March 15.
Benjamin Sparks, a lawyer representing American Oversight, raised concerns that "these messages are imminent danger of destruction" due to settings within Signal that can be set to delete messages automatically -- prompting Judge Boasberg to order the Trump administration file a sworn declaration by this Monday to ensure the messages are preserved.
The lawsuit -- which names Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the National Archives as defendants -- asked a federal judge to declare the use of Signal unlawful and order the cabinet members to preserve the records immediately, as Signal's deleting of messages violates governmental record-keeping requirements.
The use of the Signal group chat was revealed Monday by The Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg, who said he was inadvertently added to the chat as top national security officials, including Hegseth and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, were discussing the military operation.
According to screenshots of the Signal messages published by The Atlantic, the messages were set to disappear after a certain timeframe. Originally, the messages were set to disappear after one week. Then, according to screenshots of the messages published by the magazine, on March 15 -- after Hegseth sent the first operational update -- the messages were set to disappear after four weeks.
Judge Boasberg declined, for now, to order administration officials to disclose if Signal had been used by the Trump administration in a wider context.
"I don't think at this point that that's something that I would be prepared to order," he said.
On the heels of Trump early Thursday accusing Boasberg on social media of "grabbing the 'Trump Cases' all to himself," the judge began the hearing by providing a detailed description of the D.C. District Court's automated system for assigning cases, including how each judge is allotted "electronic cards" to ensure cases are fairly distributed.
"That's how it works, and that's how all cases continue to be assigned in this course," Judge Boasberg said.
Boasberg earlier this month temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport more than 200 alleged gang members to El Salvador without due process, leading the White House to call for his impeachment and publicly attack him as a "Democrat activist" and a "radical left lunatic."
Lawyers for the Department of Defense, prior to Thursday's hearing, filed a declaration stating that they have requested that a copy of the Signal messages in question be forwarded to an official DOD account so they can be preserved.
A second declaration, from a lawyer for the Treasury Department, stated that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, along with Bessent's chief of staff, has retained all messages beginning with Mike Waltz's messages on March 15.
Trump and other top administration officials have downplayed the use of the Signal to discuss the attack, saying classified information was not shared in the chat, despite the exchange including information on the weapons systems being used and the timing of the strikes.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- Stephanie Gonzalez says she and her family have endured "heartbreak" since the deportation of her parents, 55-year-old Gladys and 59-year-old Nelson Gonzalez.
"They really did not deserve to be treated as criminals," Stephanie Gonzalez, 27, told ABC News on Wednesday, describing how she and her sisters, 23-year-old Gabriella and 33-year-old Jessica, have been "devastated" as their parents, who possess no criminal records and have lived in the United States for 35 years, have been transported like "animals" and placed in "inhumane" conditions.
Stephanie Gonzalez said her parents were arrested and detained on Feb. 21 after a routine supervision appointment. That day, Gladys Gonzalez was initially granted a one-year extension to stay in America, prompting her daughter to think that "everything's gonna be fine, like it always is."
A few hours later, however, Nelson Gonzalez called to inform the family he was being detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and that Gladys' extension was revoked and she was being detained as well.
"They separated them in separate rooms. They were in rooms alone for hours with no food," Stephanie Gonzalez said. "They had handcuffed them from their hands or from their wrists and from their ankles."
She added that it is jarring for her parents to be "treated like criminals," especially since they had "never, ever been in trouble with the law."
ICE confirmed to ABC News that Gladys and Nelson Gonzalez do not have criminal records and have been deported to Colombia.
It noted that its "routine operations" involve arresting people who commit crimes as well as "other individuals who have violated our nation's immigration laws."
Stephanie Gonzalez said her parents were transported to detention facilities in different states without knowing where they were going and that she and her sisters had no way of tracking them, calling it "a mess."
"It baffles my mind how they're treating people this way," she said, adding that it's "so cruel" that they were "literally moving them around like animals."
Stephanie Gonzalez also said her parents had no way of finding each other while in custody -- they just happened to be on the same plane back to Colombia.
"When they got on the plane, everyone started clapping because they knew that they had been reunited after so long," she said, smiling at this "really sweet moment" among the deportees. She added that she feels relieved they are now together in Colombia.
Nelson and Gladys Gonzalez came to America in 1989, seeking asylum from violence in Colombia, their daughter said.
They then faced multiple instances of "fraudulent" lawyers, she said, including one who wasn't even an attorney and others who ended up disbarred, consequently preventing the proper citizenship paperwork from being filed. Stephanie Gonzalez described this as "so discouraging when you're trying so hard ... to do the right thing."
An ICE spokesperson said in a statement that Nelson and Gladys Gonzalez "illegally entered the United States" in 1989. After they appeared before an immigration judge who found "no legal basis" for them to remain in the U.S., ICE said the couple was granted a "voluntary departure" with a final removal in 2000.
Stephanie Gonzalez confirmed that her parents were faced with a voluntary deportation day in 2000, but she added that they subsequently spent over 20 years filing appeals. Though her parents' cases were closed in 2021, Stephanie Gonzalez said they were instructed simply to continue showing up to their supervision appointments and check in with the appropriate authorities.
During these supervision visits, Nelson and Gladys Gonzalez consistently got approved to stay in the U.S., though the time frame almost always varied, she continued.
"Sometimes, they would get three months. One time, they got one month. One time, I think they got almost three years where they didn't have to appear before immigration," Stephanie Gonzalez recounted.
"I think it just shows how broken the immigration system is because there was no set rule," she said, adding that her family always hoped for a "really nice officer."
Prior to the supervision visit in February that resulted in her parents' deportation, Stephanie Gonzalez said she and her sisters "weren't necessarily nervous" because they had been accustomed to "getting good news that they could stay in the country."
"When I realized that they had gotten arrested and I wasn't going to even be able to say goodbye, it was awful," she said. "The fact that I couldn't even hug them and just … feel their bodies -- like it was really hard on me and my sisters."
Stephanie Gonzalez said her parents offered to self-deport and pay for their own flights to preserve their "dignity" but the government refused.
She said not only do Stephanie and her sisters now have to grieve their parents' absence but they are also left to settle their parents' affairs and belongings, causing the situation to feel "like somebody died."
Stephanie Gonzalez said it has been difficult given how close-knit her family is, especially as she and her sister Gabriella lived with their parents in an apartment in Orange County, California. She also expressed sadness that her parents cannot spend time with Jessica's 7-month-old son, their first grandchild.
Her mother was the baby's primary caretaker, and Gabriella had to quit her job to watch after him once their mother was no longer able to, Stephanie Gonzalez added.
Nelson Gonzalez was a certified phlebotomist who drew blood and conducted life insurance exams, his daughter said. He was also a part-time Uber driver, even working overnight to make extra money, with Stephanie Gonzalez emphasizing what immigrants like her parents "contribute to society."
She expressed a desire for the public to change the narrative around immigrants, emphasizing that her parents are "hardworking people. … They've paid taxes. They've raised us three to follow the law. … They love America."
Stephanie Gonzalez and her sisters started a GoFundMe page, which has raised over $75,000.
She noted that she feels "devastated" to hear "so many parents being taken from their kids, families being separated and broken apart."
"That is something that should break people's hearts," she said.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- Some U.S. states could be treated to a northern lights display thanks to a minor geomagnetic storm on the sun, according to space forecasts.
Another round of aurora borealis is expected on Thursday night, with a predicted Kp index of magnitude four out of nine, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Space Weather Prediction Center.
The northernmost states in the U.S. have the highest chances of seeing the northern lights, including Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, NOAA's aurora viewline map shows.
In October, the sun's magnetic field reached its solar maximum in its 11-year cycle, according to NASA. When sunspots produce a solar flare, coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which are bursts of magnetized plasma emitted from the sun's corona, travel toward Earth as part of the solar wind, manifesting in a dazzling light show of luminous greens and pinks as the material interacts with Earth's magnetic field.
The lead-up to the solar maximum resulted in the best northern lights display in 500 years in May, when a series of powerful solar storms made the lights visible as far south as Alabama.
Another strong geomagnetic storm in November made the auroras visible even in light-polluted cities like New York City.
Sunspots with intense magnetic activity are predicted to occur through the end of the solar maximum, which is expected to last until March 2026, according to NOAA.
The best times to view the northern lights are in the hours just before and after midnight, between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. local time, according to NOAA.
Smartphones and digital cameras are more sensitive to the array of colors and can capture the light shows even if they're not visible to the naked eye, NASA says.
If you're curious whether the northern lights will be visible where you live, the citizen science platform Aurorasaurus allows users to sign up for alerts. The app also sends alerts that northern lights are being seen in real time, based on user reports.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(TUSCALOOSA, Ala.) -- Federal immigration agents have detained a University of Alabama doctoral student who is a citizen of Iran, according to the school and ICE records.
Alireza Doroudi, a doctoral student from Iran studying mechanical engineering, is currently being held in a detention facility, but ICE records do not list where he is being held.
The reason for his detention was not immediately clear.
"The University of Alabama recently learned that a doctoral student has been detained off campus by federal immigration authorities," the university said in a statement. "Federal privacy laws limit what can be shared about an individual student. International students studying at the University are valued members of the campus community, and International Student and Scholar Services is available to assist international students who have questions."
"UA has and will continue to follow all immigration laws and cooperate with federal authorities," it said.
It was not immediately clear whether he had secured legal representation.
Doroudi's Linkedin page says he is a "trained metallurgy engineer with over ten years of academic experience in Materials Science, welding, and brazing."
Doroudi is one of multiple college students to recently be detained by ICE.
Tufts University Ph.D. student Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish national, was arrested by immigration authorities as she was headed to meet her friends and break her fast on Tuesday.
Earlier this month, pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil was arrested by ICE. Khalil had been one of the leaders of pro-Palestinian encampment at Columbia University last spring.
Khalil was taken from his student apartment building in lower Manhattan, and then to an immigration detention facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey, before being transferred to Louisiana.
President Donald Trump claimed Khalil was a "Radical Foreign Pro-Hamas Student" and said this is the "first arrest of many to come" in a post on his Truth Social platform this month.
"We will find, apprehend, and deport these terrorist sympathizers from our country -- never to return again," he added.
Khalil and his lawyers have denied he supports Hamas or has any ties to the group.
A second student involved with the protests at Columbia University was also arrested by the Department of Homeland Security this month.
Leqaa Korda was arrested by agents from Homeland Security Investigations for allegedly overstaying her expired visa -- which terminated on Jan. 26, 2022. Korda was also allegedly arrested in 2024 for her involvement in the protests, according to DHS.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(WASHINGTON) -- Organizations that provide legal aid to migrant children have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services after the agency cut funding to the program that provides legal representation to tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors.
According to the lawsuit filed on Thursday, some of the groups that received federal grants have had to stop taking on new clients and "face the real threat of not being able to continue their ongoing representations."
Last week, groups that have collectively received over $200 million in federal grants were told that the contract was partially terminated, ending the funding for legal representation and for the recruitment of attorneys to represent migrant children.
Currently, 26,000 migrant children receive legal representation through the funding.
The groups, which filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, are asking a federal judge to issue an injunction and block HHS from ceasing funding for legal representation for unaccompanied children.
"As a consequence of Defendants ordering Plaintiffs to stop providing direct legal services, many unaccompanied children will never speak to a lawyer, will never apply for immigration relief for which they are eligible, will remain in tenuous status for longer, and will not understand what is happening as they are rushed through adversarial removal proceedings," the groups said in the filing.
ABC News has reached out to HHS for comment.
The groups added that the cuts in the funding will cause immigration judges to spend more time on cases for unaccompanied children who appear in court without a lawyer "at a time when the immigration court backlog is already at an all-time high."
"Defendants' actions will also cause chaos throughout the immigration legal system and are particularly harmful because they come at a time when the government is reinstating expedited docketing for removal cases for unaccompanied children," the groups said.
In a statement, Sam Hsieh, an attorney for the Amica Center, one of the groups that represent migrant children, called the decision to terminate the programs "the most brazen attack on immigrant children since family separation."
"The Trump Administration's decision to terminate these national legal service programs poses a significant threat to the rights of already vulnerable unaccompanied immigrant children," Hsieh said. "Many of these children are eligible for immigration relief but are unable to meaningfully seek it without an attorney."
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- One day after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal restrictions on ghost guns, prosecutors in New York are warning 3D-printing companies their "insufficient security measures" are causing a "troubling rise in access to unregulated weaponry."
The warning came in a letter Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg sent Thursday to Creality 3D Technology Co. and other 3D-printing companies that asks them to make fixes to stop the proliferation of ghost guns on city streets. The letter makes specific reference to Luigi Mangione allegedly using a 3D-printed ghost gun and silencer to murder United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson last year.
Bragg said he sent the letter because of "a growing and concerning number" of ghost guns being manufactured by personal desktop 3D printers based on downloadable gun part designs and detailed assembly guides found on the "Creality Cloud."
The district attorney said many of the guns are being assembled by felons and minors who have ready access to online instructions.
"It is paramount that you work to remove weaponry from your company's cloud services and explicitly ban the creation of illicit weapons in your company's user agreement," the letter from Bragg said. "It is imperative that you take swift action to protect your customers and the communities they live in from violence and criminal activity by adopting commonsense security measures to deter the spread of illicit firearms both locally and across the United States."
In New York City, the NYPD reported a significant increase in ghost guns seized on the streets from 2020 to 2025. In 2018, 17 ghost guns were seized. In 2024, the number was 438. Many of those were made with Creality printers, Bragg said.
"For instance, in 2023, our investigation found that an individual who was 3D-printing assault weapons and manufacturing illegal drugs utilized a Creality printer to print multiple firearms. In another instance, in 2023, an individual who threatened to kill his girlfriend was found to be manufacturing an arsenal of weapons in his apartment using a Creality printer. Additionally, recent research has found that the vast majority of illegal 3D printed guns were created using Creality printers, specifically the Ender 3 series model," the letter said.
Creality did not respond to a request for comment from ABC News.
"I am concerned about the troubling rise in access to unregulated weaponry, especially among individuals convicted of felonies and minors, because of insufficient security measures connected with your products and business policy decisions," Bragg said.
The letter did not threaten prosecution but requested a meeting with the company.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- A document unsealed Tuesday from the criminal case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams may raise questions about the testimony of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche during his Senate confirmation hearing.
During the hearing, Blanche was asked about the Justice Department's decision to drop the corruption charges against Adams.
"What I just saw with the dismissal of the Adams charge, that was directed by D.C., correct?" Democratic Sen. Peter Welch asked.
"I have the same information you have," Blanche responded. "I don't know beyond what I've [seen] publicly reported."
However, a newly unsealed draft letter from then-interim U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon suggests Blanche may have known more than he let on.
Sassoon, who was fighting the directive to drop the mayor's case, wrote that she expressed concern to top DOJ official Emil Bove that such a grave decision about a high-profile case should wait until Blanche was confirmed. In response, Sassoon wrote that "Bove informed me that Todd Blanche was on the 'same page.'"
Sassoon would later resign rather than obey Bove's order to drop the mayor's case.
Her draft letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi was among a tranche of materials ordered unsealed by Judge Dale Ho, who is still considering whether to dismiss the case against Adams.
The Justice Department insisted Blanche played no role in the determination to seek dismissal.
"Todd Blanche was not involved in the Department's decision-making prior to his confirmation," a spokesperson said in a statement provided to ABC News.
The mayor's lawyer said the unsealed letter is further proof that the case should be tossed.
"As I've said from the beginning, this bogus case that needed 'gymnastics' to find a crime - was based on 'political motive' and 'ambition', not facts or law. The more we learn about what was really going on behind the scenes, the clearer it is that Mayor Adams should have never been prosecuted in the first place," the mayor's lawyer, Alex Spiro, said in a statement.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(WASHINGTON) -- The U.S. has arrested a top MS-13 gang member, according to a post on X by Attorney General Pam Bondi.
"I'm proud to announce that early this morning our brave law enforcement officers conducted a successful operation that captured a top MS-13 national leader," Bondi posted. "DOJ will not rest until we make America safe again."
The photo shared on X by Bondi showed a major operation in northern Virginia with FBI officials, including Director Kash Patel, and dozens of officers.
At a press conference on site, Bondi, Patel and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin touted the arrest of a 24-year-old who was allegedly a top-3 MS-13 gang member.
Bondi touted the operation as a success, lauding the teamwork of the various agencies involved and said she personally witnessed the collaboration.
"America is safer today because of one of the top domestic terrorists in MS-13, he is off the streets," she said. "This guy was living in a neighborhood right around you. No longer. Thanks to the great men and women of law enforcement, this task force that we have created is remarkable, using incredible technology that we will not discuss, to catch and apprehend these horrible, violent, worst of the worst criminals."
Officials did not release the name of the individual they arrested.
President Donald Trump celebrated the arrest in a post on his social media platform, applaud his "border czar," Tom Homan.
"Just captured a major leader of MS13. Tom HOMAN is a superstar!," Trump wrote.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- Honey bee colonies across the United States are facing record-breaking losses in 2025, with scientists warning the impact could be felt in agricultural production.
Washington State University entomologists announced this week that commercial honey bee colony losses are projected to reach between 60% and 70% in 2025.
Over the past decade, annual losses for colonies have typically ranged between 40% and 50%, marking a significant jump this year.
Priya Chakrabarti Basu, an assistant professor of pollinator health and apiculture at WSU told ABC News that honey bee losses could stem from nutrition deficiencies, mite infestations, viral diseases and possible pesticide exposure during the previous pollinating season.
"I honestly think this is a combination of multiple stressors, which is why for years my lab has been focusing on understanding the impacts of and interactions of these stressors on bee pollinators," Basu said, adding that America's commercial beekeepers are under pressure to maintain colonies.
"The pollination demands haven’t gone down, so beekeepers face tremendous pressure to keep the same number of colonies to meet those needs," Basu said.
Pollination is critical for food production, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, with the agency saying about 35% of the world's food crops depend on animal pollinators to produce.
Crops that depend on honey bees and other pollinators to grow include fruits and vegetables -- like apples, strawberries, cucumbers and avocados -- but also nuts, such as almonds and macadamia nuts, the USDA said. Other affected plants include coffee, cocoa and vanilla, according to the USDA.
"I don't want to be a fearmonger, but this level of national loss could mean increased bankruptcies amongst beekeepers," Brandon Hopkins, a professor of pollinator ecology at WSU, said in a press release accompanying the research.
Hopkins said the effects could be felt the strongest in California's almond production.
California almonds are the biggest crop for honey bee pollination, which happens in February and March, according to Hopkins.
"The almond industry frequently asks for strong colonies," Hopkins said in the release.
"But this year, growers are desperate," he added. "Anything with live bees in a box is in demand because the industry is short on supply. I haven’t heard of that since the early days of colony collapse around 2008.”
Honey bees had a production value of nearly $350 million in 2023, according to the USDA.
In order to combat such severe colony losses, WSU scientists are working on methods for widespread varroa mite control, awareness on commercial honey bee colony management practices and new research on bee nutrition in the hopes beekeepers will have better access to healthy food for their colonies, according to the release.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(WASHINGTON) -- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration's effort to lift U.S. District Judge James Boasberg's block on deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.
The appeals court heard arguments Monday over the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act last week to deport more than 200 alleged members of a Venezuelan gang to El Salvador with no due process.
The Trump administration's attempt to remove alleged migrant gang members in that manner deprives the men of "even a gossamer thread of due process," Judge Patricia Millett wrote in her concurring opinion.
Disregarding their rights simply because they are unpopular or labeled terrorists, Millet wrote, would mean abandoning the "true mark of this great Nation."
"The true mark of this great Nation under law is that we adhere to legal requirements even when it is hard, even when important national interests are at stake, and even when the claimant may be unpopular," she wrote. "For if the government can choose to abandon fair and equal process for some people, it can do the same for everyone."
Trump last week invoked the Alien Enemies Act -- a wartime authority used to deport noncitizens with little-to-no due process -- by arguing that the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua is a "hybrid criminal state" that is invading the United States. Boasberg temporarily blocked the president's use of the law to deport more than 200 alleged gang members to El Salvador, calling the removals "awfully frightening" and "incredibly troublesome."
Boasberg ordered that the government turn around the two flights carrying the alleged gang members, but authorities failed to turn the flights around, saying they were already in international waters.
Judge Millet and Judge Karen Henderson -- who was first nominated to the federal bench by Ronald Reagan -- determined that Boasberg acted correctly and within his authority when he temporarily blocked any deportations under the AEA.
"The district court entered the TROs [temporary restraining orders] for a quintessentially valid purpose: to protect its remedial authority long enough to consider the parties' arguments," Judge Henderson wrote in a concurring opinion.
Judge Justin Walker -- a Trump appointee -- dissented from the majority because he said the noncitizens should have filed their case in Texas, where they were deported from, rather than Washington, D.C., adding that the lower court's decisions "threaten irreparable harm to delicate negotiations with foreign powers on matters concerning national security."
He added that the public interest favors "swiftly removing dangerous aliens" compared to letting the case move through a court that lacks venue over the matter.
"The district court here in Washington, D.C. -- 1,475 miles from the El Valle Detention Facility in Raymondville, Texas -- is not the right court to hear the Plaintiffs' claims. The Government likely faces irreparable harm to ongoing, highly sensitive international diplomacy and national-security operations," he wrote.
Judge Millet pushed back on Walker's claim that the men should have used habeas corpus to challenge their deportations in a Texas court, writing that such an approach is a "phantasm" of due process because the Trump administration would have removed the men before they could even file a claim.
"The government's removal scheme denies Plaintiffs even a gossamer thread of due process, even though the government acknowledges their right to judicial review of their removability," she wrote.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(WASHINGTON) -- The Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg responded to the Trump administration's pushback over the publication's Monday article about a Signal chat discussing a U.S. attack on Houthis in Yemen it says was accidentally shared with Goldberg.
Speaking to ABC News, Goldberg said The White House is engaging in a semantic game by focusing on his use of "attack plans" instead of "war plans" in his followup report, which was published on Wednesday.
"It's just all nonsense. It's nonsense. They're throwing up all these smokescreens to avoid being questioned about why they were so reckless as to have sensitive conversations like this in Signal, and why they invited a journalist and didn't even know that the journalist was there," he said on Wednesday. "I mean, war plan, attack plan. I mean, you know, it's just not nonsense talk, but attack is actually an accurate term for what they were doing."
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- A partial solar eclipse will be visible from the U.S. this weekend, but only a select few of the northernmost states are expected to get a glimpse of the cosmic phenomenon.
On early Saturday morning, the moon will pass in front of the sun, casting its shadow for viewers across the Atlantic Ocean, according to NASA. Since the moon, sun and Earth are not perfectly lined up, the movement will result in a partial eclipse, in which the sun will look like a crescent, or like a piece has been taken out of it.
"The moon is not able to block the entirety of the sun," Lujendra Ojha, an assistant professor at Rutgers University's Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, told ABC News.
The shadow of the eclipse moves from west to east, opposite the apparent motion of the Sun and the rest of the sky, according to NASA. The orbital motion of the moon, which is the same direction as Earth's but twice as fast, determines the direction of the eclipse's shadow.
Sunspots can sometimes be visible during solar eclipse events, according to NASA.
People in Europe, western Africa, eastern Canada and the Northeast in the U.S. are positioned to see a partial eclipse.
When and where to see the partial solar eclipse from the US
Northeast states such as Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and New York will be able to get the best view of the partial solar eclipse, Matthew Newby, an associate professor of physics at Temple University, told ABC News. Regions to the north of the U.S., such as northeastern Canada and Greenland, will likely get the best view globally, Newby said.
Those with the best view may see up to 90% of the sun covered, but the further south you go, the less coverage there will be, Newby said. Maine is expected to experience 80% coverage, while New Hampshire will see about 50% coverage and New York about 30% coverage, Newby said.
The viewing window starts between 6:30 a.m. and 7 a.m. ET for most locations in the U.S. NASA published a list of start times by city.
In the rest of the U.S., the central part of the moon's shadow will appear to completely miss the Earth, so viewers won't be able to see the event, according to NASA.
Newby recommended that viewers contact local astronomers to get the most accurate viewing information in your area.
"It should be a beautiful partial eclipse," Ojha said.
The next partial solar eclipse will take place in September and will be visible from Australia, Antarctica, the Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean, according to NASA.
A total solar eclipse will be visible in Greenland, Iceland, Spain and Russia in August 2026.
The next solar eclipse to be visible from the U.S. will take place in January 2028.
How to view the partial solar eclipse safely
Anyone who plans to watch the partial solar eclipse will need safe solar viewing glasses to protect their eyes, according to NASA.
While it is always dangerous to stare directly into the sun, the presence of an eclipse actually gives people a reason to look at it, increasing the likelihood of cases of injured corneas, Newby said.
UV radiation, whether from natural sunlight or artificial rays indoors, can damage the surface tissue, cornea and lens of the eye, according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
"Looking at it with your unaided eye can cause permanent vision damage, and staring at the sun with any sort of magnifier that's not perfectly safe can instantly blind you," Newby said.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(WASHINGTON) -- In February 2023, El Salvador President Nayib Bukele posted to social media a tightly edited video with dramatic music showing thousands of men, with their heads pushed down, being transferred to the country's newest prison: the Terrorism Confinement Center.
"Early this morning, in a single operation, we transferred the first 2,000 gang members to the Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT)," Bukele said on X. "This will be their new home, where they will live for decades, unable to do any more harm to the population."
Two weeks ago, Bukele posted a similar video on X in which hundreds of men in white uniforms, with their heads shaved, are seen running bent over while being moved into the mega prison. But this time, the individuals weren't criminals who were arrested in El Salvador.
The video showed CECOT receiving over 200 Venezuelan migrants who are alleged to be members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. The migrants were sent to El Salvador by U.S. authorities under the Alien Enemies Act, as part of a $6 million deal the Trump administration arranged in their effort to crack down on illegal immigration.
CECOT, one of Latin America's largest prisons, was opened as part of a crackdown on criminal gangs in El Salvador, whose incarceration rate is one of the highest in the world. The mega prison, which can hold up to 40,000 detainees, has been criticized by human rights groups over alleged human rights violations.
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was scheduled to visit the prison on Wednesday along with the Salvadorian minister of justice.
The move by the Trump administration to deport alleged migrant gang members to a notorious prison in another country, without due process, has sparked an outcry from relatives of some of the detainees and by immigration advocates and attorneys who say that some of those deported were not Tren de Aragua gang members.
An official with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement last week acknowledged in a sworn declaration that "many" of the noncitizens deported last week under the Alien Enemies Act did not have criminal records in the United States. Administration officials have not been clear about the evidence they have that shows the detainees are gang members.
In a subsequent sworn declaration, ICE Acting Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations Robert Cerna argued that "the lack of specific information about each individual actually highlights the risk they pose" and "demonstrates that they are terrorists with regard to whom we lack a complete profile."
The declaration was included in the Trump administration's recent motion to vacate Judge James Boasberg's temporary restraining order blocking deportations pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act.
"While it is true that many of the [Tren de Aragua gang] members removed under the AEA do not have criminal records in the United States, that is because they have only been in the United States for a short period of time. The lack of a criminal record does not indicate they pose a limited threat," Cerna said.
Ivannoa Sanchez, who told ABC News that her husband, Jose Franco Caraballo Tiapa, is being held at CECOT, said that he has never been in trouble with the law.
"He has never done anything, not even a fine, absolutely nothing," said Sanchez.
"I can't rest, I don't even eat, I haven't even had juice or water because I know he isn't eating either," Sanchez said.
Juanita Goebertus, the director of the Americas Division of the advocacy group Human Rights Watch, told ABC News that detainees in CECOT, as well as other prisons in El Salvador, are denied communication with their relatives and lawyers, and only make court appearances in online hearings, often in groups of several hundred detainees at the same time.
"The Salvadoran government has described people held in CECOT as 'terrorists,' and has said that they 'will never leave,'" Goebertus said, adding that the Human Rights Watch is not aware of any detainees who have ever been released from CECOT.
According to human rights advocates and immigration attorneys, CECOT prisoners only leave their cell for 30 minutes a day and sleep on metal beds in overcrowded cells.
"They only have about half an hour outside of their windowless cells to be outside in a hallway of the prison," Margaret Cargioli, an attorney for the nonprofit Immigrant Defenders Law Center, told ABC News. "They are overcrowded within each of the cells, and they're sleeping on metal."
For years, Amnesty International has published reports on detention centers and prisons in El Salvador, and has alleged systematic abuse of detainees and "patterns of grave human rights violations." Those findings were acknowledged in a 2023 human rights report published by the U.S. Department of State that said there have been significant human rights issues in Salvadoran prisons.
Ana Piquer, the Americas director at Amnesty International, called the detainment in El Salvador of the Venezuelan migrants a "disregard of the U.S. human rights obligations.”
"Amnesty International has extensively documented the inhumane conditions within detention centers in El Salvador, including the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) where those removed are now being held, " Piquer said in a statement. "Reports indicate extreme overcrowding, lack of access to adequate medical care, and widespread ill-treatment amounting to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment."
Attorneys representing some of the Venezuelan migrants told ABC News that the lack of communication is a special concern -- as opposed to the U.S., where detainees can communicate with their families and attorneys.
"There's no communication with family or counsel," Cargioli said of CECOT. "The concern just raises to an entirely other level."
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(ACWORTH, Ga.) -- A Georgia mother recounted the moment she was "tug-of-warring" with a man she said tried to snatch her 2-year-old son from her while in a Walmart.
Caroline Miller was shopping at a Walmart in Acworth with her two young children last week when the incident occurred. They were in a motorized wheelchair at the time because her 4-year-old daughter wanted to ride it, she told Atlanta ABC affiliate WSB.
The suspect first approached the family and asked for help finding Tylenol, she told the station.
"When I pointed my arm out this way to point to the direction of where it was, that is when he reached down, put both of his hands on Jude, and grabbed him out of my lap," Miller told WSB this week.
"I'm like, 'No, no, no, what are you doing? What are you doing?'" she told the station. "He pulled him. I pulled him back. We're tug-of-warring."
The mother was able to break away with her son and the suspect fled the store, according to police.
"I'm just glad that he's still home with us," Miller told WSB.
Officers responded to the Walmart on March 18 "after receiving a call of a male who attempted to snatch a juvenile away from their mother," the Acworth Police Department said in a press release.
The child was not injured in the incident, police said.
Detectives spoke to witnesses and reviewed surveillance cameras and Flock safety surveillance cameras installed in the area, Acworth police said. They subsequently identified a suspect and secured a warrant, police said.
"We were able to see the car he got into, and followed the cameras, and used our Flock cameras in the city and was able to get a tag number and track him down," Sgt. Eric Mistretta with the Acworth Police Department told WSB.
Mahendra Patel, 56, of Kennesaw, was arrested on Friday and has been charged with kidnapping, simple battery and simple assault, police said.
He remains in custody at the Cobb County Sheriff's Office with no bond, online jail records show. Online records do not list any attorney information.
Miller said her children now know how to respond in dangerous situations.
"As much as we would think it would never happen, it will and does, and to be prepared for when it does," she told WSB.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
(NEW YORK) -- The Atlantic on Wednesday published a new article detailing purported information about recent American strikes in Yemen it says was accidentally shared with a journalist via Signal by senior members of President Donald Trump's National Security Council.
The follow-up article in The Atlantic disputes the administration's claims that no classified information was shared on the group, to which editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added. Officials within the administration are "attempting to downplay the significance of the messages that were shared," the article said.
The article suggested that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth updated members of the "Houthi PC small group" Signal chat on "favorable" weather conditions ahead of planned airstrikes on Houthi leaders and other targets in Yemen.
The article said Hegseth also notified the group of a planned timeline for flights of F-18 strike aircraft, MQ-9 Reaper drones and Tomahawk cruise missiles that were launched for the mission.
"THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier 'Trigger Based' targets," Hegseth wrote ahead of the operation, referencing the time stamp of "1415," or 2:15, according to The Atlantic.
U.S. Central Command confirmed those details on the day of the strikes by releasing footage as well as other images showing the take off of Navy F-18's from the carrier USS Harry S Truman in the Red Sea.
The White House has insisted the communications in the group chat were not war plans, that the information was not classified and criticized The Atlantic journalist who detailed the account -- though it has not disputed the authenticity of the messages.
"No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS. Foreign partners had already been notified that strikes were imminent. BOTTOM LINE: President Trump is protecting America and our interests," national security adviser Michael Waltz posted on X.
"Nobody's texting war plans," Hegseth said on Wednesday. "I noticed this morning out came something that doesn't look like war plans. And as a matter of fact, they even changed the title to attack plans because they know it's not war plans."
"It's very clear Goldberg oversold what he had," Vice President JD Vance posted to X.
Goldberg, during an interview with ABC News Live anchor Kyra Phillips, responded to the administration pushback.
"They have decided obviously, instead of simply saying, 'Yeah we had a security breach and we're going to try to plug that breach and do better next time,' they've decided to blame the guy who they invited into the conversation," Goldberg said.
"It's a little bit strange behavior, honestly," Goldberg continued. "I don't know why they're acting like this, except to think that they know how serious a national security breach it is and so they have to deflect it and push it on to the guy, again, they invited into the chat, namely me."
Goldberg criticized the administration for going after The Atlantic's description of the chat as war plans, calling it "semantic games."
"They're throwing up all these smokescreens to avoid being questioned about why they were so reckless as to have sensitive conversations like this in Signal and why they invited a journalist and didn't even know that a journalist was there," he said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged on Wednesday that "obviously someone made a big mistake," but insisted that the overall mission was never jeopardized.
ABC News contributor Mick Mulroy, a former senior Pentagon official and CIA officer, said the information shared on the commercial app appeared to detail an ongoing operation that shouldn't be shared publicly.
In Mulroy's opinion, "It is highly classified and protected. Disclosure would compromise the operation and put lives at risk. Next to nuclear and covert operations this information is the most protected."
The initial story in The Atlantic only described the operational part of the message chain, but did not divulge specifics.
According to the article, Hegseth later messaged the group with after-action updates, notifying members that specific Houthi leaders had been located and identified immediately before strikes on their locations.
Democrats are demanding answers after the mishap as they express alarm about the administration's handling of national security information.
Democratic Rep. Jim Himes, the ranking members of the House Intelligence Committee, criticized top intelligence officials as they appeared for a hearing on Wednesday.
"I think that it's by the awesome grace of God that we are not mourning dead pilots right now," Himes said. "Two general officers sitting at the table and the people who work for all of you know that if they had set up and participated in the Signal chat, they would be gone, and they know that there's only one response to a mistake of this magnitude."
"You apologize, you own it and you stop everything until you can figure out what went wrong, what went wrong, and how it might not ever happen again. That's not what happened," Himes said.
Copyright © 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.